ei kashif stop ur mischievous argument, that naxals killed more people than muslim jihadis. when hindus are suffering due to islamic terrorism, u comments are adding insult to injury. yes naxals killed people but who are they? they were never common people. they were police men, people who were supporting the cause.and in stray incidents they might have killed innocent people. they never planted bombs in shopping malls,or near temples, or in parks. like mulim jehadis. cowardly jehadis are killing innocent hindus planting bombs in public places. there is wide gulf of difference between a naxal and jehaadi modus operandi. in telugu there is a proverb when a person is crying that his hut is on fire, a stranger comes to him and asks him for amatch box to lit his cigar. like wise when hindus are suffering due to islamic terrorism u are reminding us of naxalism. and even ur argument that islamic terrorist killed less than naxals does not hold ground. since the unholy islamic invasions of kings from arab countries from 10th century.to upto today,if we start counting the casualties among both communities hindus and mulsims. the statistics would scaring to intolerant muslims. and the death toll would 10 crore hindus brutally killed and more than five crore hindus forcibly converted to islam whose descendants are modern day bangladeshis, indians, pakistanis mostly. dont dig for facts the whole world is vexed of islamic terrorism. a hindu might show a reactionary vengence against amuslim. but never for life time. but a jehadis ideal is to bring all non muslim elements to islam by hook or cranny. he is always for islamic state and hindu blood who according to him an infidel, an idolator , an anthropomorphist. mr kasif i will tell the germ of terror is in quran and the tragic utterances of mohammed. if is because of mohammed and quran that we hindus are suffering. sophists like the islamic scholar zakir naik can not defend quran no longer from being busted. u have to understand that hinduism does not believe neither one god principle nor hundred god principles. it emaphasises the principle called loko binna ruchihi which means religion according the psyche of the individual. and as his personal approaches to religion such as whether he worships an idol or doesnt worship, he is a monotheist or a poly theist , or an a theist ,or a henotheist. this things dont matter. what matters is spirituality . monotheism has long departed from india and hinduism. go and study vivekananda books regarding the difference between hinduism and world religions. and the books of zakir naik which would instill u to become a terrorist and commands u to destroy more statues if there are like the bumiyan buddha statues.