Zakat distribution system must be reformed: Dr.Rahmatullah |
UPA government’s financial inclusion policy and economic empowerment of Muslims |
![]() Federation of Muslim Women’s Aid Societies formed in TN |
Top doctors in Azamgarh are Muslims
By Mumtaz Alam Falahi, TwoCircles.net
Part of the Azamgarh speaks series.
New Delhi: Though just 15% of the population of the district, Muslims of Azamgarh have made their presence strongly felt in the health sector. Top ten doctors of the district are Muslims. They are also running some big hospitals.
One may contest Azamgarh Muslims’ view that the alleged involvement of some of their youths in terrorist activities is just a conspiracy to halt their progress, what is uncontested is that they not only went abroad and earned money and brought prosperity to the town, their youths are getting higher education in Delhi, Aligarh and other cities and most importantly they form the top queue of prominent doctors in Azamgarh. And credit for this goes to Aligarh Muslim University. Most of the present prominent doctors have done medical courses at Aligarh. Some also got education at Lucknow, Kanpur and Varanasi.
Some of them are so popular because of their higher success rate and low or no fee that even a rickshaw puller can take you to them.
Topping the doctors is Dr. Jawed Akhtar, orthopedics. He renders his services at very low fee. Just ask a rickshaw puller and he will take you there exactly. MBBS from Aligarh Dr. Jawed attends 400-500 patients daily. He also runs a 3-storey hospital.
Dr. Imtiaz is the leading cardiologist of the town. MBBS and MD from Aligarh, Dr. Imtiaz is very popular.
Dr Amir Alam is one of the most successful surgeons of the city. MBBS and MS from Aligarh, Dr Alam conducts 15-20 successful operations daily. He also runs 50-bed Poorvanchal Hospital.
Dr Moazzam, MD and MS from Aligarh, is the top eye specialist and surgeon of Azamgarh. He also runs Nazir Moazzam Hospital.
Dr Khursheed, MBBS and MD, is a successful plastic surgeon in a small town of Azamgarh.
Dr Zorar is the leading child specialist. MBBS from BHU, Dr Zorar also runs Nazima Child Care Centre.
Top chest specialist of the town is Dr Syed Shahabuddin. MBBS and MD from Aligarh, he also runs 50-bed Aqsa Hospital.
Among other renowned doctors are Dr Ehtesham, MBBS, MD, Dr Siddique Ejaz Ahmad, MBBS, (in Sarai Meer) and Dr Furqan, a surgeon also MBBS from Aligarh. Inspite of a successful practice, Dr. Furqan is able to take time out for peforming Hajj pilgrimage once every five years.










Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles and photographs for free. You just have to credit us and link to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under
Kashmir is gone, forget about it
Kashmir is gone, forget about it; ask if Hindus will disintegrate what remains of India
Executing you will bring peace. But we have the clemency offer as well - you can convert. If you fight with Muslims, that is what will happen - one or the other.
With the rest of the Hindus, there is no problem. You follow your religion, we follow our's.
As for Kashmir, when you say Muslims should be second class citizens, why should Kashmiris want to be part of India ?
Kashmiris should cite your post to demand independence. It will be better for you to let Kashmir go
Mr Chaddhiwala, I am not the
Mr Chaddhiwala,
I am not the one who has written the earlier article, but still I would like to give answer to your comment.
You talk about hindu's attack on christians, but kindly reply that if there was an organization of people who tried to use money and other tempting factors , targeting economically poor and starving muslims to lure them to convert to christianity then what would have been the reaction????
I am sure it would not have been much different.
Babri masjid demolition was not right at Ayodhya, but what was the fault of mumbai people in it. And the bomb blasts had killed even many muslims in it.
Politicians always have liked to divide and rule.
All terrorist attacks had no effect on any politician but have effected only the common people. mumbai, delhi, bangalore, jaipur everywhere it's common man (of all religion) who died as when a bomb blasts, it does not ask your religion before killing you.
for politicians these killings hardly matter.
You talk about Muslims uniting against hindus. I have not seen any hotel run by muslim banning hindus, nor any showroom run by a muslim banning hindus. same is the practice of hindu business community.
At the end only middle class hindus and muslims are left to fight out and kill each other.
Kashmir is an example of how Hindus ruin India
Kashmir is an example of how Hindus ruin India with their communal politics
There is already secondary citizenship for Muslims and minorities in India. I have already refuted it, so you have changed the subject to Kashmiri Hindus. Your proposal is not going to change the position of Kashmiri Hindus.
In Kashmir, the 1989 elections were rigged and the Pandits instead of standing with their fellow Kashmiri Muslims to protest this, opted to seek special support of the Indian army.
When the Kashmiri Pandit Jagmohan was made Governor, he brought in the Indian army to attack Muslims. He told the Kashmiri Pandits to come out to Jammu where he set up special camps for them. He told them the Indian army would clear out the militants in 3 months , and then they could go back. It was a typically communal Hindu approach - bring the Indian army to give selective protection to Hindus, and use them to attack Muslims. It was then that the militants decided to target the Pandits.
So the Pandits have burnt their boats; the militants see them as betrayers, the Indian army cannot protect them, and they cannot go and fight themselves.
If Hindus try any of the nonsense you propose in the rest of India, then the Muslims will strike you also. You know the fighting capacity of the Hindus - it is like the Kashmiri Pandits.
There is only one way to deal with racist Hindus of your type . You know what that is.
Your Hindu Hitler Gowalkar advocated secondary citizenship for non-Hindus. So did Hindutva ideologue Savarkar. So the Muslims demanded a second country to have a second citizenship !! So your wishes were met. Then why are you crying ? Hindus always betrayed India with their communalism.
As I said, if you want to fight Muslims, let one of your Hindu leaders say so. Then the Muslims can formally declare a jihad. We know how Hindus fight. You also know how Hindus fight.
Can we have restrictions on Hindus (like Advani and Modi) who collect Hindu mobs to riot, rape and kill ? Then Muslims will not retaliate and kill Hindus.
Can we also shut down RSS run schools that teach hatred of minorities ? Then there will be no problem emanating from madrasas.
You are obviously a duplicitous, communal Hindu. Why don't you have any suggestions for Hindus who indulge in anti-national, anti-humanity activities ? People like Modi and Advani ?
Hindus like you only understand one thing. When the Muslims blow your brains out, you stop.
As a result of the Babari masjid, Muslims blew up Bombay. After that, the Hindus kept quiet for some time. Then they did Gujarat. So they blew up trains in the Gujarati commuter belt of Bombay. Now, the Hindus are keeping quiet.
No more rath yatras, and demands for temple construction. It seems Hindus can only be kept under control with periodic blows from the Muslims. The day you try to build a Ram mandir, Muslims will blow it up.
HAY- Pesecution of Pandits commenced before Babri- Gujrath
Hay Anonymous Sab, The persecution of Pandits in Kashmir commenced in Kashmir in 1989 much before Babri and Gujrat. Kashmir had been "ethnically cleansed" of HINDUS by KASHMIRI MUSLIMS in 1989 itself, much before Babri demolition and Gujrath riots, a fact which is conveniently forgotten by all INDIAN MUSLIMS!!!!!!. AND it has happened in KASHMIR which is "THE ONLY MUSLIM MAJORITY STATE IN INDIA", where as per your "QUR'AN and Muhammad the minorities should have been protected".Why is that INDIAN MUSLIMS only remember BABRI and GUJRATH while forgetting the HINDUS OF KASHMIR WHO HAVE BECOME REFUGEES IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY?????? The history of ISLAM in India is spread with instance of persecution of HINDUS -Pakistan became an ISLAMIC REPUBLIC in 1947 and drove out all HINDUS- NOT a SECULAR republic like INDIA who gave an option to all religious group to live in harmoney- BANGLADESH also opted to be an ISLAMIC REPUBLIC in 1971, even though they were "butchered" by PAKI "ISLAMIC" ARMY and it was India who assisted them in securing their independence from "THE PAKI BUTCHERS"- and in 1989 the KASHMIRI MUSLIMS again decided to throw out HINDUS from a state of INDIA itself- SO can you blame the HINDUS if the HINDUS are apprehensive that in any place where MUSLIMS become a majority, the Hindus will be driven out- "ethnically cleansed"????
Kashmiri Pandits polluting whole country with Brahmanism
Your article is well meaning, but not totally truthful.
India could never win the trust of the Kashmiris because it was ruled like a colony managed from Delhi. The Indian government has repeatedly rigged elections. The Valley took to arms when the 1989 election was rigged by Rajiv Gandhi, preventing the rightful winners, the Muslim United Front from taking power.
Had the central government not done this, people like Syed Salahuddin would have been sitting in the Lok Sabha. Due to the rigging he went on to find the Hizb-ul Mujahideen.
The Indian army has killed over 70,000 people and women have been raped. Even the British did not raoe our women. Indians should feel ashamed.
We should release the Kashmiris from bondage. Just as the British realised that they could not govern India without the consent of Indians, the Indian government should realise that Kashmir cannot be ruled without the consent of Kashmiris.
It is too late to argue that we can make the Kashmiris see the economic and other benefits of staying with secular democratic India. After Gujarat and Orissa, it is difficult to sell that.
According to the rules of partition, Muslim majority areas should have gone to Pakistan, but Nehru wanted to keep Kashmir, no doubt because it was his birthplace.
Nehru was India's greatest PM, and I have great admiration for him, but Nehru's whim for having Kashmir is no reason to hold on to it by force, if the people do not want to be with India.
After making few correct statements, the author goes on to make a case for how India could hold on to Kashmir by concentrating on economic development.
However, with rigged elections, deaths over 40,000, and army brutality, there will be no takers. Army rule is not democracy.
The Indian practice of appointing Hindu-approved leaders like Farooq Abdullah and Omar Abdullah and over riding electoral results is not consonant with democracy or secularism.
Why should Kashmiris believe in India ?
The Indian government has to acknowledge what it did wrong (like rigging elections), and have a concrete plan to make amends to the Kashmiris.
If the Kashmiris do not still accept, then India should proceed to the plebiscite.
If Kashmir wants to secede, India's security concern can be addressed by demanding that independence is given on the understanding that Kashmir will be a demilitarised state, vacated by both Indian and Pakistan armies. I think that is reasonable compromise.
Will Paki Agree for it ...
Dear Friend you may be thinking that you have given a great suggestion which was ever though by any one in this world i.e. 'Kashmir will be a demilitarised state, vacated by both Indian and Pakistan armies' but what is the guarantee that Kashmir will not become another Pakistan for India? What is the guarantee that the vilon of the entire region and the exporter of Islamic terrorists to the world i.e. Paki will stick to this and will leave Kashmiris to enjoy their freedom?. Friend when you talk about the fate of muslims in J&K you will never talk about the fate of Kashmiris in POK. They don't even have the so called fake democracy atleast and are treated like beasts according to several reports of human watch.
Above all the state of Kashmir like a few more free state of its period had opted to be accessed to India, and Kashmir has been integral part of India for centuries and it will remain so .. Indian Gov. is not an external govt like Brithish to let Kashmir go as scripted and being executed by willy neighbour.
I agree there might be some human rights violations which shall surely be condemned, and Govt really woes an appology to the Kashmiris for this, but Kashmir remain an integral part of India if the Kashmiris are to see any development in their life tie, if Kashmiris are not to become like Afganistanis. What Islamic Fundamentalists given to Afganistan is well known to the world, the same will be done to Kashmiris the very moment India plays back from Kashmir ....
Muslims- Why not take back Kashmiri Pandits to Kashmir???
Friend, Tell your Kashmiri Muslims to take back the Kashmiri Pandits back to Kashmir so that pollution of India is stopped.
Friend, According to the rules of partition, Muslim majority areas "of only British Governed India" should have gone to Pakistan not "princely states like Kashmir,Patiala, Jaipur" etc where the rulers were given the option to join either India or Pakistan. The King of Kashmir opted to join India like King of Patiala, Jaipur etc. The matter is now non-negotiable because it could reopen all the old cases, each princely state wanting to become independent again. Which Royal descendant including Mr Arminder Singh the ex-Congress CM of Punjab wouldn't want to be be the King of his country again. Would any Indian want a situation like that???
The invasion of Kashmir in October 1947 by PAKI MUSLIM TRIBALs supported by Paki Army was exactly like what Paki Army did in Mumbai on 26/11. Plan and execute everything but flatly deny involvement- they did that in Kargil too.
Quit talking about your religion
Lucky you. Being an Indian, India affords you the benefit of Secularism (Pseudo?). Had India been ruled according to the Sharia law, your mothers and daughters would have been married off by age 10 that too to some 50 year old grand-pa.Lucky that you are not a resident of the middle-east and Pakistan (NWFP/SWAT).
If Islam is the only true religion, can you name one Islamic country in this world to which Islam has brought prosperity. A cursory glance at either of our neghbours is enough to answer this question. Every other Islamic nation is running around with a begging bowl. Islam did not even bring prosperity to middle-east,it is the oil that did.
A secular country should prohibit any religion claiming to be superior to all other religions. Infact, words such as Kafir(s) and Infidel(s) should be banned by modifying the constitution accordingly. If you clearly and logically observe, the problem is with you muslims(and Christians) trying to enforce your religion claiming to be a Superior religion. If the problem is with Hinduism, how come the Buddhists/Jains/Jews ...etc dont have a problem with the Hindus.
If you muslims (and Christians) stop making these claims then there is no need for conversion and thereby, no need for VHP/Bajrang Dal ... etc. As Moqtedar Khan (http://www.ijtihad.org/) says, quit living in a state of denial.
It will be interesting to know what will happen to middle-east once when Alternative Energy cars become mainstream.
begging bowl
Of course oil brought prosperity in middle east, OPen your eyes over a billoin hindus are Still begging from western counries, For now licking BY US ass few of Your cities are developing, I have seen india, you dont have even toilets, men and women shit together by railway track, Thank BRITISH they have build railway system or you would be still riding cows.
Competing with other countries
It is not just a billion hindus; It is a billion Hindu/Christians and Muslims ... etc are shitting on the roadside. How do you think the muslims shit in "Prosperous" countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia ... etc.
Look at what you (Muslim and Christian) scoundrels, such as you, did to our country. If not for we hindus, you guys would have converted India to one hell of an Islamic ghetto. If all that you guys aspire for is 90 virgins when you all die can one expect anything better?
Today if we Hindus are living and working outside India that is because we are intellectuals. Unlike people like you who plundered us years before via the Crusade (Christians) and Arab Invasion(Islamic Invasion) we compete and work with the local people and earn money legitimately. If the muslims have the middle-east to look upto and the Christians have the west to look upto, we dont have any where else to look upto. But yet,our influence on the world is ever increasing Did you ever wonder how? That is because we value truly believe and respect secular education.
Where as even now what do you guys do in the MiddleEast when you go on Haj -Kiss the Arab's backside?
Coming to think of the Railway Tracks, Imagine what would have happened to the Arabs if the Whiteman would not have discovered Oil and Developed technologies to produce the same? Instead of the Luxury Sedan you guys would have still been going around in your Camels. On the other hand,look at Israel even without Oil there economy is thriving.
Anyway, another 10 more years is all that I see for the worth of Oil. But After 10 years, Im sure you guys will come up with a conspiracy theory to belittle the technology and innovation as a whitemans conspiracy.
Why are you guys crying over the Babri-Masjid demolotion even now when you guys cannot even secure and protect the Prophet's (Holy Mohammed) house?
http://www.chowk.com/articles/9566
http://www.jafariyanews.com/2k5_news/sep/5prophethome_destruction.htm
I think I have given you enough food for thought. You cannot do much about the demolished house in Mecca but can you do something about the Oil becoming irrelevent? You have ten-years.
Good Luck
Does anyone know what is the punishment for a Brahmin thief?
Does anyone know what is the punishment for a Brahmin indulging in theft ?
The Manusmriti invokes all kinds of severe punishments for sudras who raise their voices. Molten lead should be poured into their ears. Rama in the Ramayana cuts of Shambuga’s head for doing penance and reciting the Vedas. Killing a Brahmin is the biggest sin. It will damn you to life as a sudra in the next reincarnation !
In the case of the Malegaon Blast, we have a Brahmin godman charged with murder of another non Brahmins. Supposing this is true, it is intriguing to know what the punishment should be - according to Brahmanism.
This is another blow to Brahmin worship. It is comic to hear about junior and senior 'seer' - it seems there are two varieties of holy criminals ! The Brahmanas of the Kanchi mutt have been pooling the money collected from the common masses for murder. This is their idea of dutiful sharing of the wealth.
It is well known that the Brahmins spend their time plotting against the other castes and communities of India. But it would be interesting to know how they would behave if they lived in an environment where everyone is a Brahmin. This is an experiment for which the results can be obtained from the Kanchi mutt. When there is a sufficient concentration of them, in a secluded institution such as the Kanchi mutt, then we see their rapacious capacity for intrigue and murder. Then they will murder other Brahmins !
According to Manusmriti, killing a Brahmin is the biggest sin. But it does not prescribe the punishment for a Brahmin killing another Brahmin.
Does anyone know how the Brahmanical law applies in this case ? With such sordid details of what happens in the Kanchi mutt, what does the BJP hope to gain by going on about 'an attack on Hinduism'? It reminds me of the Hindutva criminals here such as chaddhiwalas who stole internet IDs to defend his silly Hindu pride !
If Hindus indulge in criminality, one cannot complain that it is an attack on Hinduism if others object.
please dont publish these kind of articles
assalamolaeykum...
i am a muslim student hailing from azamgarh itself .
i read this article and going through the things going on currently in azamgarh and with the people of azamgarh .. i would like to ask u whats the need for such a kinda of article .
first of all.. if its journalism then u guys dont now the meaning ...
second thing about this article i didn't like it is that .. the journalist has tried to play with the facts. most of the information given are either completely false or even if they are true .. has been molded according to the need.
i being a muslim and hailing from azamgarh think that whatever be the reality it should be put as it is .. no one shuld mold it... i can point out .. mistakes in the facts ... from top to bottom.
but i won't do that .. i was very surprized by the fact u didn't go through the reality check and just published it on the internet ... i am talking about the moderator .
so please .. in future whatever u publish it muuuuusst be true ..so what ever impression u leave in the minds of reader .. should not be like what i have .. of ur site .
ALLAH HAFIZ
I know you are not muslim you are Brahmin (chaddhiwala)
I know you are Brahmin and not muslim from Azamgarh..
Good to hear from you . I am happy you have made an effort to explain hidden Hindutva agenda. I am not clear whether these are your views, or these are the views of Hindutva as seen by Hindutvawadis. But most of it is characterized by the usual doublespeak of the Hindu fascists.
Mr Brahmin, only you are stopping yourself from being respected as an equal ! I recommend introspection and character reform. The best option for you is to keep your false Hindu pride under check and think as an Indian.
The Hindus brought mob violence and pogroms against minorities into Indian politics. It started with Advani and the demolition of the Babari masjid.
Modi massacred Muslims in Gujarat. Now the Hindus have also started persecuting the Christians.
As for the Muslims, their reaction is clear. After Ayodhya, they retaliated with serial blasts in Bombay. It has continued ever since. The Muslims are now ready to go after the Hindu's throat.
I don't see how the Delhi encounter will send a strong message to terrorists. They stood their ground and fought, and they killed the police inspector leading the assault. It shows the Muslims are ready to fight and die.
The only solution is for the Hindus to rebuild the Babari masjid, and punish Hindu criminals like Modi and Advani.
But Hindus like to shield their criminals, so this internal war will continue. The Hindus have succeeded in turning the rest of India into Kashmir, where gun battles and bomb blasts rage in cities
Post new comment