to mr abdul the fool, im also praying god to atleast show u the problems associated with monotheistic faith like islam though not cure ur mental illness. i will also answer to three questions posed by u. before answering that i want to bring toyour light that u are already in severe mental illness. because you are a comparing a social conflict with that of a religious conflict that is hindu and mulsim conflict. i will enligten u so that uwould atleast come out of your utter ignorance. firstly, the naxalites, the assami gorilla and the ltte , are those out fits that have nothing to do with religion. they are either fighting for an ideological cause, for some independent states. you argument that they are hindus the readers will laugh at u if they read both of our articles because they are internal problems of a country. they neither bombed mosques or churches to say that they are hindus. in pakistan especially in north west frontier province and in baluchistan there are certain muslim tribe lords who still believe in an independent state from pakistan.and also sunnis kill shias where and when they like either in pakistan or in iraq under sunni saddam. just like the proverb revolution eats its own children islam is eating its own children great example is iraq daily we hear news about iraqi sunni terrorists killing through bomb explosions. does that mean that i should say that all sunni muslims in iraq and pakistan are terrorists. according to ur argument if naxals are hindus then all sunnis are muslim terrorist. and also india is successfully dealing with these elemnts in controlling them. and lets come to biggest debate why hindus are in majority despite islamic butchery of hindus for centuries. 1. what a dud u are to supres the fact that muslims king either mughals or nawabs or sultan killed and ravaged millions lives of hindus. it is as though you were supporting hitler that he hadnt killed jews other wise today we wouldnt have jews today. your muslim kings did kill hindus in large number. i have already studied the demographic distribution of hindus before islamic invasion. hindus were living as far as the easter parts of iran that is beluchistan , nwf province, whole of pakistan , the great hindu king dahir fought against them and lost the battle. after he lost the battle entire hindus were butched in a mass genocide and the remaining lot were absorbed into islam and as slaves. you go dig any part in pakistan u would see the remains of a hindu civilisation destroyed by islam.u really are adud and dude too hindus were peace loving people they never had communal violence till the advent of arab invaders. hindus took some time to organise themselves to understand that it was a civilisational clash. and finally that islam was foreign to india andhindus . the very vijayanagara empire was to brought into existence to vanquish the onslaught of unpeace ful islam and protect hindu dharma in south india during thirteenth century. the whole india was full of hindus and muslim killed and forcibly converted as many hindus asthey could . but the native culture and ethos repulsed islam and kept struggling with it . and great hindus kings sacrificed their lives for native cause and culture. some of them were chathra sal the rajputs, jats , all hindu sikh gurusnotably guru govind singh, u study history first the great mughal empire stood on the shoulder strenght of loyal hindu rajputs.as the religious intolerance mounted to its peak durign the ..... reign aurangazeb who didnt even spare shia s of south india. there were hundred of hindu revolts against him and finally the islamic domination came to an end in india. the argument that hindus are still a majority hence muslim kings never killed does not hold good because in a forest if we see the buffaloes are in majority than lions does that mean that buffaloes were never eaten by their past ancestorial lions. foolish. u study the muslim chronicles they would tell u how systematically hindus were buthchered during the reigns of delhi sultanate and during the raids of taimur the lame.china is the most populous country does that mean that japanese didnot kill chines during the second world war .they killed more than one crore chinese for their empire building in the south east asia. in the same way u argument has no sound basis . 2. the second argument that hindus never fought against aurangzeb does not hold ground. sikhism is an offshoot of hinduism. in hinduism a spiritual aspirant can choose aguru as his spiritual master like wise many people chose nanak as their guru and the very gurus were hindus govind sing, arjun dev, teg bahadur, etc. aurangzeb laid jaziya on hindus, destroyed somanath temple, kasi viswantha temple, butchered kashmiri hindu pandit , proselytised hindu sikhs, uprooted shia kingdoms and rightly owned as the islamic fanatic of his own times.killed his own brother darahshukov for his hindu lineance. also come to know that only the higher officials were muslims during mughal empire and the majortity of other were totally hindus and mughal empire fell because they lost the support of hindus and especially hindus. 3.if half knowledge peoplelike zakir naik can get acclaimed you and i can also get acclaimed if we stick to your own arguments.you also dont know that india is the master of intellectual debates. what is the use of one lakh audience and one innocent hindu guru who knows only spirituality than argument.as there are many ignorants in the world than learned people. zakir naik is yet another mad blind scholar of that medieval text quran.if i start questioning him who always keeps combining science and islam., he would keep his head in an unwanted place. his arguments are totally false because mohammed prophet fussing about his revelations were false. is this science mohammed marrying a rich old lady who was nearly twenty years older than him. is this a widow reform movement. no definitely it is a debauchery of human civilisation. instead of marrying her he should have got adopted to her. such is islamic nature of debate. if they marry four wives they say widow reform movement.mohammed deranged ideas of god which he falsely acclaimed that they were by god too dont hold good . he was not at all disciplined in his spiritual trainning by any other guru. so today we see as many sophists like zakir naik treading the same ignorant pathof mr mohammed from arabia who was totally responsible for the mayhem of non muslims till today. islam is the cancer sitting in the belly of the world. dont worry it shall be removed by the intellectual debates of a hindu like me who knows that religion is apersonal and not a social affair andthat it varies with person to person as the saying goes loko binna ruchi, and yath bhavam that bavathi. jai hind.

1. Muslim rulers ruled Hindustan for around thousand years. You can see the result - creation of Pakistan, Bangladesh and communal problems in India. 1000 years is not enough for an ancient culture to be decimated.
2. Aurangazib and Sikhism - Read History well and the teachings of the sikh gurus.
3. Zakir naik, no doubt is an intelligent man. Religious theology needs intelligence to discuss. There are enough intelligent hindus who can debate with Zakir naik. Intelligence does not equate with "Truth". "Truth" is an absolute concept and is extremely difficult to conceptualize. I have seen Zakir Naik avoid questions, which were difficult to answer even for an intellectual like him, as he has limited the intellectual capacity not only of himself, but also his followers, by teaching that Islam is the truth.
Hope I have helped you to start to think, rather than be blind-folded.

Close your eyes, calm down, slow your breathing and then.........Ask yourself the question, "Who am I"?..........It is a very deep question......You will realize that answers are not easy.....Ask Zakir Naik the same question........."The truth" cannot be confined to any religious book, be it of the muslims, christians, hindus, buddhists, jews etc..........